MT-Bielecki Bulletin
Games Statistics
Draw percentage
Draw percentage is high (83%), but this is common feature of current cc tournaments, especially high rated.
| Result | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | 100 | |
| White Win (1:0) | 11 | 14 |
| Black Win (0:1) | 2 | 3 |
| Draw (0,5:0,5) | 65 | 83 |
Number of moves
Number of moves in the event in total: 2888; Average number of moves per game: 37
The longest game has 92 moves (Ljubicic-Lafarga) and the shortest one 15 (Hoeven-Langeveld).
David Lafarga – 503 moves in the event with average 42 and Leonardo Ljubicic – 498 moves with average 42 were the most persistent players. They played also the longest game (92 moves).
Maximilian Voss – 347 moves with average 29 and Arno Nickel – 348 moves with average 29 were on the economical side.
More detailed statistics see below.
Openings statistics
| Openings | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | 100,0 | |
| 1.e4 | 48 | 61,5 |
| 1.d4 | 27 | 34,6 |
| 1.Nf3 | 3 | 3,9 |
The most popular opening was Sicilian Defence (27) – especially Najdorf (14) – ahead of Queen’s Gambit (13) and Ruy Lopez (13). For more detailed statistics see below.
Openings classification by ECO (78 games)
| A | 3 | A – Flank openings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 1 | |||||
| A17 | 1 | A17 English Opening, Hedgehog Defence | ||||
| A9 | 2 | |||||
| A90 | 2 | A90 Dutch Defence | ||||
| B | 30 | B – Semi-Open Games other than the French Defence | ||||
| B1 | 3 | |||||
| B12 | 3 | B12 Caro–Kann Defence | ||||
| B3 | 9 | |||||
| B30 | 3 | B30 Sicilian Defence | ||||
| B31 | 1 | B31 Sicilian, Nimzovich–Rossolimo Attack | ||||
| B33 | 5 | B33 Sicilian, Sveshnikov (Lasker–Pelikan) Variation | ||||
| B4 | 2 | |||||
| B40 | 1 | B40 Sicilian Defence, 2.Nf3 e6 | ||||
| B49 | 1 | B49 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation | ||||
| B5 | 1 | |||||
| B54 | 1 | B54 Sicilian | ||||
| B9 | 14 | |||||
| B90 | 10 | B90 Sicilian, Najdorf | ||||
| B94 | 1 | B94 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.Bg5 | ||||
| B96 | 1 | B96 Sicilian, Najdorf, 7.f4 | ||||
| B97 | 2 | B97 Sicilian, Najdorf, 7…Qb6 including Poisoned Pawn Variation | ||||
| C | 19 | C – Open Games and the French Defence | ||||
| C1 | 6 | |||||
| C10 | 6 | C10 French, Paulsen Variation | ||||
| C6 | 1 | |||||
| C67 | 1 | C67 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence, Open Variation | ||||
| C8 | 4 | |||||
| C88 | 2 | C88 Ruy Lopez, Closed | ||||
| C89 | 2 | C89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall Counterattack | ||||
| C9 | 8 | |||||
| C92 | 2 | C92 Ruy Lopez, Closed, 9.h3 | ||||
| C93 | 2 | C93 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Smyslov Defence | ||||
| C95 | 4 | C95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer Defence, 10.d4 | ||||
| D | 17 | D – Closed Games and Semi-Closed Games | ||||
| D2 | 2 | |||||
| D20 | 1 | D20 Queen’s Gambit Accepted | ||||
| D27 | 1 | D27 Queen’s Gambit Accepted, Classical Variation | ||||
| D3 | 1 | |||||
| D30 | 1 | D30 Queen’s Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defence | ||||
| D4 | 10 | |||||
| D43 | 7 | D43 Queen’s Gambit Declined: Semi-Slav Defence | ||||
| D44 | 3 | D43 Queen’s Gambit Declined: Semi-Slav Defence 5.Bg5 dxc4 | ||||
| D7 | 3 | |||||
| D72 | 2 | D72 Neo-Grünfeld, 5.cxd5, Main line | ||||
| D76 | 1 | D76 Neo-Grünfeld, 6.cxd5 Nxd5, 7.0-0 Nb6 | ||||
| D8 | 1 | |||||
| D81 | 1 | D81 Grünfeld; Russian Variation | ||||
| E | 9 | E – Indian Defenses | ||||
| E0 | 2 | |||||
| E04 | 1 | E04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3 | ||||
| E05 | 1 | E05 Catalan, Open, Classical line | ||||
| E1 | 1 | |||||
| E17 | 1 | E17 Queen’s Indian, 5.Bg2 Be7 | ||||
| E3 | 2 | |||||
| E32 | 2 | E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical Variation (4.Qc2) | ||||
| E5 | 2 | |||||
| E58 | 2 | E58 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line with 8…Bxc3 | ||||
| E6 | 2 | |||||
| E60 | 2 | E60 King’s Indian Defence |
===
Game records
Game records can be displayed at the tournament website or downloaded from ICCF server (pgn format).
Few games annotated by participants can be found below as an attachment to this file. One game was annotated by GM (OTB) Twan Burg. Many thanks for that.
==================
Please select specific annotated game from pull down menu.
Annotated games MT-Bielecki Top 9 (pgn zip)
============