{"id":2839,"date":"2011-12-17T08:41:41","date_gmt":"2011-12-17T07:41:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/?page_id=2839"},"modified":"2012-01-06T08:33:46","modified_gmt":"2012-01-06T07:33:46","slug":"portugal","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/?page_id=2839","title":{"rendered":"Portugal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Name of Federation<\/strong>: APXC \u2013 Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Portuguesa de Xadrez por Correspond\u00eancia<\/p>\n<p><strong>Year of Foundation<\/strong>: 1983 \u2013 CNXC;\u00a0Refoundation: 2010 \u2013 APXC<\/p>\n<p><strong>ICCF Delegate<\/strong>: Jo\u00e3o Salvador Marques (<a href=\"mailto:jrodavlas@hotmail.com\">jrodavlas@hotmail.com<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>E-Mail contact<\/strong>: Joaquim Pedro Soberano (<a href=\"mailto:soberano@apxc.pt\">soberano@apxc.pt<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Website<\/strong>: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apxc.pt\/\">http:\/\/www.apxc.pt\/<\/a> ;\u00a0Blog: <a href=\"http:\/\/apxcpt.blogspot.com\/\">http:\/\/apxcpt.blogspot.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Article provided by<\/strong>: \u00c1lvaro Pereira \/ Joaquim Pedro Soberano<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/APXC.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2840 alignleft\" title=\"APXC\" src=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/APXC.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"119\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The definitive History of Chess in Portugal remains to be written.<\/p>\n<p>However, we know that in our country chess as an organised sport started in the 1920s, not only over the board but also by correspondence.<\/p>\n<p>Thus it is not surprising that Portugal participated in CC Olympiad 1. What is rather strange is the fact that the internationally inexperienced members of the team reached the final, where they achieved fourth place. We notice even at this early stage a certain tendency for the Portuguese players to have more success in correspondence than in OTB play.<\/p>\n<p>Portugal also participated in Olympiad 2 (later renamed <a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/?page_id=572\">Olympiad 1<\/a>, while the previous one became known as the <a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/?page_id=564\">European Olympiad<\/a>), once again achieving fourth place in the final through team \u201cA\u201d, with players from Lisbon.<\/p>\n<p>After a few decades of not so brilliant performances, Portuguese CC over the past 30 years has recovered its international reputation, with some good results, either individually or as a team. During the 80s and the 90s, \u00c1lvaro Pereira and Lu\u00eds Santos did well in the World Championship 13 Final (Jo\u00e3o Cordovil qualified for the World Championship 14 Final, but was forced to withdraw due to illness), Ilda Miranda was 10th in the Ladies World Championship 5 Final and the national team finished 5th in Olympiad 9.<\/p>\n<p>More recently, Portugal won the last edition of Copa Latina and placed 4th in Olympiad 15 Final, 5th in European TC 7 Final and 3th in NATT 6.<\/p>\n<p>Hor\u00e1cio Neto took part in World Championship 23 Final, ending 8th, and seven Portuguese players are participating in Candidate Tournaments.<\/p>\n<p>On the women&#8217;s side, Portuguese CC has been unusually active, presenting a team in the last two Ladies Olympiads. And, for a while, Maria Gil was ranked 2th lady in the ICCF Elo list.<\/p>\n<p>Portugal has 5 Grandmasters \u2013 \u00c1lvaro Pereira, Lu\u00eds Santos, Joaquim Pedro Soberano, Hor\u00e1cio Neto and Ant\u00f3nio Silva \u2013, 12 Senior International Masters \u2013 Carlos Quaresma, Jo\u00e3o Peres, Jos\u00e9 Pereira dos Santos, Fernando Cleto, Ant\u00f3nio Dem\u00e9trio, J\u00falio Flores, Gustavo Morais, Ant\u00f3nio Moura, Francisco Pessoa, Luis Quaresma, Luis Sim\u00f5es Reis and Manuel Camejo de Almeida \u2013 and 8 International Masters \u2013 Jo\u00e3o Cordovil, Jo\u00e3o Leonardo, Eduardo Calhau, Vitor Cordeiro, Jos\u00e9 Am\u00e9rico Moreira, Albano Pinheiro, Joaquim Brand\u00e3o de Pinho and Jo\u00e3o Salvador Marques.<\/p>\n<p>Since mid-20th century until the present time, CC in Portugal went through several changes and adjustments. For many years it was part of the Portuguese Chess Federation, with no legal personality and no administrative or financial autonomy. However, in 2010, APXC emerged as an autonomous association, run by a five member Executive Board and with its own legal frame, registered publicly. The current members of the APXC Board are: Jo\u00e3o Salvador Marques (President), Ant\u00f3nio Moura (Treasurer), Pedro Soberano, Am\u00e9rico Moreira, Jo\u00e3o Ferreira (Tournaments Director) and Eduardo Calhau (ICCF applications).<\/p>\n<p>For some years CNXC published a CC chess magazine named Pe\u00e3o Distante. Today, the printed edition has been replaced by a digital bulletin available online to every CC enthusiasts.<\/p>\n<p>At the present time, Portugal has some 100 players registered in ICCF.<\/p>\n<p>See our website at www.apxc.pt and our blog at www.apxcpt.blogspot.com.<\/p>\n<p>* * *\u00a0<!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<p>Playing for the \u201cB\u201d team \u2013 made up by players from Oporto \u2013 in the first world Olympiad, Alexandre Gon\u00e7alves inflicted on Cecil Purdy one of the only two CC defeats he suffered in his entire career.<\/p>\n<p>That game (see it on the 2002 ICCF Gold Book) was the first victory of a Portuguese player over a World Champion to be. In 2009, no less than three Portuguese GMs won to former World Champions.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2841\" style=\"width: 224px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Alvaro-Pereira.jpg\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2841\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2841\" title=\"Alvaro Pereira\" src=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Alvaro-Pereira-214x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"214\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Alvaro-Pereira-214x300.jpg 214w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Alvaro-Pereira-107x150.jpg 107w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Alvaro-Pereira-400x560.jpg 400w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Alvaro-Pereira.jpg 503w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 214px) 100vw, 214px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2841\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">GM \u00c1lvaro Pereira<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2842\" style=\"width: 308px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Horacio-Neto.jpg\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2842\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2842\" title=\"Horacio Neto\" src=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Horacio-Neto-298x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"298\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Horacio-Neto-298x300.jpg 298w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Horacio-Neto-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Horacio-Neto-400x401.jpg 400w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Horacio-Neto.jpg 602w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2842\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">GM Hor\u00e1cio Neto<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2843\" style=\"width: 285px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Joaquim-Pedro-Soberano.jpg\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2843\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2843\" title=\"Joaquim Pedro Soberano\" src=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Joaquim-Pedro-Soberano-275x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"275\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Joaquim-Pedro-Soberano-275x300.jpg 275w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Joaquim-Pedro-Soberano-137x150.jpg 137w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Joaquim-Pedro-Soberano.jpg 804w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2843\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">GM Joaquim Pedro Soberano<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<p>Games<\/p>\n<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_4a615ca7' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event \"corr Heemsoth Memorial\"] [Site \"ICCF\"] [Date \"2008.??.??\"] [Round \"?\"] [White \"Umansky, Mikhail Markovich\"] [Black \"Soberano, Joaquim Pedro\"] [Result \"0-1\"] [ECO \"E66\"] [WhiteElo \"2672\"] [BlackElo \"2617\"] [Annotator \"Lu\u00eds Gonzaga Grego\"] [PlyCount \"92\"] [EventDate \"2008.??.??\"] [EventType \"corr\"] [Source \"Opening Master\"] [SourceDate \"2011.01.03\"]   1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 {Umansky stays on is own fianchetto against the Kings Indian. This was a natural move order since against Hans Berliner who states that it is wrong for White to fianchetto his light-squared Bishop they have played this variation.} Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 {Black can delay this move as Timmerman did in the Millenium Tournament. The point is that the KID for Black is about mate or loose in the Queen side. Black never get close to the White King an eventualy lost the game.} (5... Nc6 6. Nf3 a6 7. O-O Rb8 8. d5 Na5 9. c5 b5 10. cxb6 cxb6 11. Bf4 d6 12. Nd4 Bd7 13. b4 (13. b3 b5 14. Rc1 Qb6 15. Nc6 $5 Nxc6 16. dxc6 Bxc6 17. Na4 $1 bxa4 18. Rxc6 Qa5 19. Bd2 Qf5 20. bxa4 $5 (20. b4 $5 Qb5 21. Qc2 Nd7 22. Rc7 d5 23. Qd3 Qxd3 24. exd3 Rfd8 25. Bxd5 $5 Ne5 26. Bg2 Nxd3 27. Rxe7 Bd4 28. Rb1 $1 Nxf2 29. Be3 Bxe3 30. Rxe3 Rd2 31. Bf1 $2 Rxa2 32. Bxa6 Nh3+ 33. Kh1 Nf2+ 34. Kg1 Nh3+ 35. Kh1 Rd8 36. Re2 Rxe2 37. Bxe2 Rd2 38. Bf1 Nf2+ 39. Kg1 Ng4 $1 40. b5 Ne5 $1 41. Bg2 a3 42. b6 a2 43. Ra1 Rb2 44. b7 Nd7 45. Be4 Kg7 46. Kf1 Kf6 {0-1 Bang, E (2661)-Timmerman, G (2738) NBC 2000-02}) 20... Rb2 $5 21. Bc3 Rxa2 22. Rxa6 {drew in Sloth-Maliangkay, Wch. ICCF 1999.}) 13... Nc4 14. Qb3 b5 15. Nc6 Bxc6 16. dxc6 Qb6 17. Rac1 e6 18. a4 d5 19. e4 e5 20. Bg5 Qxc6 21. exd5 Qd7 22. axb5 axb5 23. Nxb5 Rxb5 24. Rxc4 Rfb8 25. Rd1 Qd6 26. Rc6 Qd8 27. Qf3 e4 28. Qf4 R5b6 29. Rxb6 Qxb6 30. d6 Nd7 31. Qxe4 Qb5 32. Be7 Ne5 33. Rd5 Qa4 34. Bf1 {1-0 Elwert,H (2680) -Timmerman,G (2735) corr 2000}) 6. Nf3 Nc6 (6... Nbd7 {The other line also possible, with a good record for Umansky: 1-0 Umansky,M (2654)-Spitz,P (2548) corr ICCF 2003, 1-0 Umansky,M-Pankratov, CAPA email 1998 and 1-0 Umansky-R. Berdichesky, Pappier Memorial email 1998).} 7. O-O {1-0 Umansky-R.Berdichesky, Pappier Memorial email 1998.}) 7. O-O a6 (7... e5 {Berliner played the old line and presented a novelty on the 10th move.} 8. d5 Ne7 9. e4 Nd7 10. Ne1 b6 $5 11. Nd3 Nc5 12. f4 $5 exf4 13. Bxf4 h6 14. Nf2 $1 g5 $5 15. Be3 f5 16. Bd4 Bxd4 17. Qxd4 f4 18. b4 f3 19. Bxf3 Rxf3 20. bxc5 bxc5 21. Qd1 Qf8 22. e5 Ng6 23. e6 Ne5 24. Nce4 Ba6 25. Nd2 Bxc4 26. Nxc4 Nxc4 27. Ng4 Rxf1+ 28. Qxf1 Qxf1+ 29. Rxf1 Kg7 30. Nf6 Ne5 31. h4 Rc8 32. h5 c4 33. Kg2 a5 34. a4 g4 35. e7 Kf7 36. e8=Q+ Rxe8 37. Nxe8+ Kxe8 38. Kf2 Ke7 39. Ke3 c6 40. Ke4 Nf3 41. Rc1 c5 42. Kf5 Ne5 43. Rc2 Kf7 44. Rb2 Nd3 45. Rb7+ Kf8 46. Kf6 Ke8 47. Ke6 Kf8 48. Rf7+ Kg8 49. Rf1 {1-0 Umansky,M-Berliner,H ICCF Email 2001}) 8. d5 Na5 9. Nd2 {The main line of the Yugoslav System.} c5 10. Qc2 Rb8 11. b3 b5 12. Bb2 bxc4 {By blocking the centre with e5, Black could avoid immediate tactical complications, but Pedro goes for the spirit of the variation and fight for the win!} (12... e5 {Keeping the position closed and trying to centralize is Na5 via Nb7 as usual in this line.} 13. Rae1 h5 14. Nd1 h4 15. e4 hxg3 16. fxg3 Ng4 17. Nf2 Nh6 18. Bh3 f5 19. Bc3 Rb7 20. Qd3 b4 21. Bb2 Rbf7 22. Qe2 Nb7 23. exf5 gxf5 24. Qh5 Rf6 25. g4 fxg4 26. Bxg4 Rxf2 27. Rxf2 Bxg4 28. Rxf8+ Qxf8 29. Qh4 Qf5 30. Ne4 Qg6 31. Qg5 Bf5 32. Qxg6 Bxg6 33. Ng5 Nd8 34. Bc1 Bf6 35. Ne4 Bh4 36. Re2 Nf5 37. Rg2 Kg7 38. Bg5 Nf7 39. Bxh4 Nxh4 40. Rg3 Nf5 41. Rg2 N7h6 42. Kf2 Ng8 43. Rg1 Nf6 44. Nxf6 Kxf6 45. Kf3 a5 46. Rf1 Kg5 47. Rg1+ Kh6 48. Kg4 Nd4 49. Rf1 e4 50. Kf4 Nc2 {0-1 Jussupow,A (2595)-Svidler,P (2740) Germany 2006}) 13. bxc4 Bh6 {Suetin (Leningrad 1967) and Kasparov (Tilburg 1981) also moved their Bishop this way} 14. f4 e5 {forcing the exchange in e6, the Bishop is controlling d2.} (14... Ng4 {was played on 1-0 Umansky,M (2654) -Hefka,V (2574) corr ICCF 2003}) 15. dxe6 Bxe6 16. Nd5 Rxb2 17. Qxb2 Bg7 18. Qc1 Bxd5 19. cxd5 Ng4 20. Rb1 Ne3 {Black is down in the exchange and plays for positional compensation.} 21. Re1 Re8 22. Bf3 Bd4 23. Kh1 h5 24. Ne4 (24. Qa3 { 1\/2-1\/2 Rogozenco,D (2562)-Motylev,A (2552) Bucharest 2000}) 24... Kg7 25. Qd2 $146 {Diagram # Here Umansky play the new move upon himself trying to attack the most unuseful piece in the black side but the h pawn will complete is role and will change the life of the black horse.} (25. Ng5 {1-0 Umansky,M (2445) -Schelle,A (2123) Fuerth 1999}) 25... h4 26. g4 Rxe4 27. Bxe4 Nac4 28. Qd3 Qf6 29. Rf1 Nxf1 30. Rxf1 Ne3 31. g5 Qd8 32. Rg1 Qd7 33. Qxa6 $4 {Diagram # A mistake in an inferior position but... what else?} (33. Bf3 Qh3 34. Be4 a5 {!!} 35. Rg2 Qd7 36. Rg1 h3 37. Bf3 Qa7 38. Rg3 c4 39. Qb1 Qd7 40. Be4 Qc8 41. Qb5) 33... Ng4 34. Rf1 Nf2+ 35. Rxf2 Bxf2 36. Kg2 Be3 37. f5 gxf5 38. Qd3 fxe4 39. Qxe3 Qg4+ 40. Kf1 Qf5+ 41. Qf2 Qxg5 42. a4 e3 43. Qg2 f6 44. Qxg5+ fxg5 45. a5 c4 46. Ke1 g4 {In this event, Heemsoth Memorial, Soberano defeated two World Champions (Mikhail Umansky and Vytas Palciauskas) and draw to another (Tunc Hamarat).} 0-1   [Event \"match amig\u00e1vel GER-POR 2007\/09\"] [Site \"?\"] [Date \"2007.??.??\"] [Round \"?\"] [White \"Pereira, \u00c1lvaro\"] [Black \"Baumbach, Fritz\"] [Result \"1-0\"] [ECO \"B35\"] [Annotator \"Pereira, A\"] [PlyCount \"91\"] [EventDate \"2007.??.??\"] [Source \"Opening Master\"] [SourceDate \"2011.01.03\"]   {Because of computers, I gave up CC a few years ago. I accepted to play this match on the the condition of being paired with Baumbach, a very friendly partner that I met in World Championship 13 and, personally, in a few occasions.} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Nc3 Bg7 6. Be3 Nf6 7. Bc4 Qa5 8. O-O O-O 9. Nb3 Qc7 10. Be2 d6 11. f4 b6 12. Bf3 Bb7 13. Nd5 {I believe that this move is not so innocuous as theory says.} Nxd5 14. exd5 Na5 15. Nxa5 bxa5 16. c3 Ba6 ({I knew two Baumbach's games on this sub-variation. In the first (chronologically), played OTB against Postler (Straussberg, DDR-20ch 1971), he chose} 16... Rfc8 17. Rf2 Ba6 {and got an easy draw:} 18. Bd4 Bxd4 19. Qxd4 Qc5 20. Rd1 Rab8 21. Qxc5 Rxc5 22. Rd4 Bc4 23. a3 Bb3 24. Rfd2 Kg7 25. Kf2 {1\/2-1\/2}) 17. Rf2 Rfc8 ({In the second, opposing Lundqvist (friendly match DDR-SWE, corr. 1975), Baumbach preferred here} 17... Rab8 {, and followed} 18. Bd4 Bxd4 19. Qxd4 Qb6 20. Rd1 (20. Qd2 {can be tried}) 20... Rfc8 21. Be2 Bxe2 22. Rxe2 Rc4 23. Qxb6 Rxb6 {, with another draw, this one in the long run.}) 18. f5 $1 {Diagram # Better than 18.Bd4, as played by Postler.} Rab8 (18... gxf5 19. Bd4 $44) 19. Bg4 $1 Rf8 $1 ({After} 19... Rxb2 20. Rxb2 Qxc3 21. Bc1 (21. f6 Qxe3+ 22. Kh1 Bxf6 23. Bxc8 Bxb2 24. Bxa6 Bxa1 25. Qxa1 Qd2) 21... Qd4+ 22. Qxd4 Bxd4+ 23. Kh1 Rxc1+ 24. Rxc1 Bxb2 25. Rc7 Bd4 26. Rxe7 Bd3 {, the bishops pair, defending all the pawns, and the bad position of the white king seem to lead to a draw. However,} (26... Kf8 27. f6 $1 Bd3 28. Rd7 Ke8 29. Be6 $1 Bxf6 30. Rxf7 Bd4 31. Rxh7) 27. Re1 $3 (27. f6 $5 Bxf6 28. Rxa7 Bc3 29. Bf3 {would be an alternative plan, but probably not so strong}) 27... gxf5 (27... Be5 28. Rxe5 dxe5 29. f6 Kf8 30. Bd7 $18) (27... Bf2 28. Rd1 Bc4 29. f6) (27... Bb2 $5) 28. Be2 (28. Rd1 $5) 28... Be4 29. Bf3 Bc3 30. Rc1 { offers good winning chances.}) 20. Qc2 {A cross-eyed queen, looking for both diagonals.} Bc4 21. Qe4 a4 (21... Rb5 $6 22. Rd1 Bxa2 $2 23. fxg6 hxg6 (23... fxg6 24. Be6+ Kh8 25. Rxf8+ Bxf8 26. Bd4+ Bg7 27. Rf1 $18) (23... Qc4 24. Rd4 $18) 24. Be6 $1 fxe6 25. Qxe6+ Kh8 (25... Kh7 26. Rxf8 Bxf8 27. Qf7+ Bg7 28. Bd4 $18) 26. Rxf8+ Bxf8 27. Qf7 (27. Rd4 $18) 27... Bg7 28. Qe8+ Kh7 29. Qxb5 $18) (21... Be5 $5) 22. Rd1 $1 (22. Rf4 $5 Bh6 $5 23. fxg6 $1 Bxf4 24. gxh7+ Kh8 25. Qxf4 f6 $1 {is not clear at all.}) 22... Bxa2 (22... a3 23. bxa3 $1 Ba6 24. Bd4 Bxd4 25. cxd4 $1 {with a strong attack; for instance:} Bc4 26. h4 Qb7 27. Bf3 Kg7 28. h5 gxh5 29. Rc2 Rfc8 30. f6+ exf6 31. Qf5 Bb5 32. Be4 Rh8 33. Rc3 Qe7 34. Re1 $18) 23. fxg6 hxg6 ({Perhaps} 23... fxg6 $5 24. Rxf8+ Rxf8 25. Qxa4 Qc4 26. Be6+ Kh8 27. Qxc4 Bxc4 28. Bxa7 Ra8 {would offer drawing prospects.}) 24. Rxf7 $1 {Diagram #} Rxf7 (24... Kxf7 25. Be6+ Ke8 26. Qxg6+ Kd8 27. Qxg7 Re8 28. Rf1 $1 $18) 25. Be6 Qc4 26. Bxf7+ Kxf7 (26... Kf8 27. Qf3) 27. Qe6+ Ke8 28. Qg8+ Bf8 (28... Kd7 29. Qxb8 Qe2 30. Qxa7+ Ke8 31. Qxa4+ $18) 29. Rf1 Qe4 {A difficult choice. Which endgame offers more chances of survival? } (29... Kd7 30. Qe6+ Ke8 (30... Kc7 31. Rxf8) 31. Rxf8+ $1 Kxf8 32. Qxg6 e6 ( 32... e5 33. Qxd6+) 33. Qxe6 Rb7 (33... Kg7 34. Bd4+) 34. Bh6+ Rg7 35. Qf6+) ( 29... Qxf1+ 30. Kxf1 Rxb2 31. Qxg6+ Kd8 (31... Kd7 32. Qg4+) 32. Bg5 (32. Bc1 $5)) 30. Qxf8+ Kd7 31. Qxb8 Qxe3+ 32. Kh1 Bxd5 33. Qf8 a3 34. bxa3 Qxc3 35. Qf4 Qxa3 (35... Qc2 $5) 36. Qg4+ Be6 37. Qxg6 a5 38. Qc2 {\/\\ Rc1} (38. Re1 $5) 38... Qb3 39. Qxb3 Bxb3 40. h4 a4 41. h5 Ke6 42. Rf2 Bc4 43. Rf4 Bb3 44. h6 Bc2 45. Rxa4 Kf6 (45... Kf7 46. Rf4+ Kg8 47. Rg4+ Kf8 (47... Kh7 48. Rg7+) (47... Kh8 48. Rg7 e6 49. g4 d5 50. g5 Bf5 51. g6 d4 52. Rh7+ Kg8 53. Rd7) 48. Rg7 d5 49. Kg1 d4 50. Kf2 {\/\\ g4, g5, g6, Rf7+}) 46. Rf4+ {The endgame with the g pawn against the d pawn is a theorical win.} 1-0   [Event \"ICCF Olympiad 15 Final\"] [Site \"ICCF\"] [Date \"2006.03.30\"] [Round \"?\"] [White \"Neto, Horacio\"] [Black \"Timmerman, Gert Jan\"] [Result \"1-0\"] [ECO \"A88\"] [WhiteElo \"2532\"] [BlackElo \"2703\"] [Annotator \"Neto, H.\"] [PlyCount \"203\"] [EventDate \"2006.??.??\"] [EventRounds \"13\"] [Source \"Opening Master\"] [SourceDate \"2011.01.03\"]   1. d4 f5 {The Dutch remain faithful to the Dutch} 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d6 7. Nc3 c6 {probably the most solid of the 3 popular alternatives} (7... Nc6 {is the classic variant;}) (7... Qe8 {is the modern variant and recommended in his book by Kindermann}) 8. d5 e5 9. dxe6 Bxe6 10. b3 Na6 ({Black can not exploit the diagonal temporary weakness with} 10... Ne4 $6 {because the quality exchange} 11. Nxe4 Bxa1 12. Qxd6 {is cleary white advantegeous. For example} Qxd6 13. Nxd6 b6 14. Bg5 Bc3 15. Be7 $16 {Ibragimov, I-Beshukov,S Smolensk 1991 1-0}) 11. Ng5 Qe7 {for now, black do not care to allow the exchange the white squares bishop.} ({black can move immediatety} 11... Bc8 $5 {if they want to prevent permanenty the bishop exchange.} 12. Bb2 (12. Rb1 $5 {with the idea Qc2 e Ba3. Petrosian,T-Knezevic, M Banja Luka 1979}) 12... Qe7 {reverses to the game.}) 12. Bb2 {Exchange the bishop with Nxe6 or no change? Since the bishop retreat is always a small concession. I choose to continue the development.} Bc8 {Black changed their idea and decided to avoid thebishop exchange.} (12... Rad8 {is more natural and seems stronger. After} 13. Nxe6 Qxe6 14. Qc2 {white advantage is minimal, but lasting. For example} Nc5 15. Rad1 Rfe8 16. e3 $14 {Transposes to the game Carlsen-Cmilyte, BNbank Blitz GpA, 2009, 1-0}) 13. Qd2 {The standard question is this kind of positions is where to put the Queen, Qd2 or Qc2? Qd2 keeps the immediate pressure os Pd6.} ({The alternative} 13. Qc2 {seemed less strong, despite allowing initiate the attack to Pd6 whit the Rook instead the Queen, as usually recommended.}) 13... h6 (13... Nc5 14. Rad1 (14. Rfd1 h6 15. Nh3 Rd8 16. Rab1 Be6 17. Qc2 g5 18. f4 Ng4 19. Qd2 $11) 14... h6 15. Nh3 (15. Nf3 Nfe4 16. Qc2 Bd7 (16... Be6 17. Nxe4 (17. Nd4 Bf7 18. Nxe4) (17. Nd2 d5 18. Ndxe4 dxe4 19. Ba3) 17... Nxe4 (17... fxe4) 18. Nd4 (18. Bxg7 Kxg7 (18... Qxg7 19. Nd4) 19. Nd4)) 17. e3 Rae8 18. Ne2 Bxb2 19. Qxb2 $11) 15... Nfe4 16. Nxe4 Nxe4 17. Qc2 Bxb2 18. Qxb2 Qe5 19. Qc1 $14) 14. Nf3 (14. Nh3 Ne4 (14... g5 15. f4 Ng4 16. e4) (14... Be6) (14... Nc5 15. Nf4 Kh7 16. h4 Nfe4) 15. Nxe4 fxe4 16. Rad1 (16. Bxg7 Kxg7 17. Rad1 Rf6 18. Qe3 Nc5 19. f3 $14) (16. Bd4) 16... Bxb2 ( 16... e3 17. fxe3 Rxf1+ 18. Rxf1 (18. Bxf1 Bxb2 19. Qxb2 $14) 18... Bxb2 19. Qxb2 $14) 17. Qxb2 Rf6 (17... e3 18. fxe3 Rxf1+ 19. Rxf1 $14) 18. Qd4 c5 19. Qe3 $14) 14... Be6 15. Rad1 Rad8 16. Nd4 {The game`s critical position. Black preferred to keep the bishop and allow the sacrifice on Pc6. However, this plan is a mistake, since the resulting position is clearly white advantageous.} Bf7 $6 (16... Nc5 {it's possible?}) (16... Bd7 {it's possible?}) 17. Bxc6 $1 { Diagram # Thematic sacrifice, already Kknown at least in the 2 games below referred} (17. Ba3 Nc5 18. Bxc6 bxc6 19. Nxc6 Qc7 20. Nxd8 Rxd8 21. Nb5 Qb6 22. Qe3 Re8 23. Rxd6 Rxe3 24. Rxb6 axb6 25. fxe3 Nfe4 26. Rd1 Bf6 27. Bxc5 { Pracejus,M-Schneider,F cr DE ch 1993 1-0}) 17... bxc6 18. Nxc6 Qb7 19. Nxd8 Rxd8 20. Nb5 d5 $1 {This was black's ifea, to rehabilitate the variant. Not only changes the weak pawn, and will force a Pb6 structure, against a+b pawns, that will be very difficult to create a white passed pawn in the queen's side.} (20... Ne4 21. Qa5 Rd7 22. Bxg7 Kxg7 23. Nxd6 Rxd6 24. Rxd6 {Comas,L-Ochoa,J Open de Barcelona 1996 1-0}) 21. Qa5 Rd7 22. Be5 Qb6 (22... Qc6 23. Nd4 Qb6 ( 23... Qc8 24. c5)) 23. Qxb6 axb6 24. cxd5 (24. Nd6 Be6 (24... Re7 25. Nxf7 Kxf7 26. Bxf6 Bxf6 27. Rxd5 Rxe2 28. Rfd1 Nc5 (28... Rxa2) (28... Be7)) 25. Bxf6 ( 25. e3 dxc4 26. Nxc4 Nd5 (26... b5 27. Rxd7 Nxd7 (27... Bxd7) 28. Bxg7 Kxg7 29. Nd6 b4) 27. f3 b5 28. Bxg7 Kxg7) (25. cxd5 Nxd5 26. Bxg7 Kxg7 27. Nb5 Kf6 28. Rc1 Nc5 29. Rfd1 Nb4 30. Rxd7 Bxd7 31. Nc3 Bc6 32. a3 Nd5) 25... Bxf6 26. cxd5 Rxd6 27. dxe6 Rxe6 28. e3 Nc5 29. Rd5 Ne4 30. a4) 24... Nxd5 (24... Nb4 25. d6 (25. Rd4 Nbxd5 (25... Nc2)) (25. f3 Nxa2 26. e4 (26. d6 Bxb3 27. Rd4) 26... fxe4 27. Bxf6 Bxf6 28. fxe4) 25... Nxa2 26. f3 (26. Ra1 Bxb3 27. Rfb1 Bc4 ( 27... Bf7) 28. Rb2 Ne4 29. Bxg7 Kxg7 30. Raxa2 Bxb5 31. Rxb5 Nc3 $11)) 25. Bxg7 Kxg7 {The position is now clarified R+P+P against N+B, with possibilities to create a passed pawn on both flanks. in my opinion this position probably is already technically won, although are many practices difficulties. At the time, already anticipate the game could reach 100 moves.} 26. Rd2 Nc5 (26... Nac7 27. Nd4 (27. Na7 Ne8 (27... b5 28. Nc6) 28. Nc6) (27. Nc3 b5 28. a4) 27... Kf6 28. Rc1 Nb4 29. a3 Ne6 30. Nf3) 27. Rfd1 Be6 28. Rd4 g5 29. f3 Kf6 30. Rc1 Ke5 { With a draw proposed, that I obviously refuse.} 31. Kf2 Re7 (31... Bf7 32. e3 ( 32. Rcd1 Be6 33. Na3 Kf6 34. Nc2 b5 35. Ne3 Nc3 36. Rxd7 Nxd7 37. Ra1 Ke5 38. Ke1 f4) (32. Rc2 f4 33. Rcd2 Be6 34. Na3 Kf6 35. Nc2 Ke5 36. gxf4+ gxf4 37. e4 fxe3+ 38. Nxe3 h5) 32... Be6 33. Rcc4 h5 34. b4 Nb7 35. a4 Nd6 36. Nxd6 Rxd6 37. a5 bxa5 38. f4+ Kf6) 32. Rcd1 (32. b4 Na6 33. a3 Nac7 34. f4+ (34. Na7 Bd7) 34... gxf4 35. gxf4+ Nxf4 36. Rxc7 Rxc7 37. Rxf4 (37. Nxc7 Kxd4 38. e3+ Kc4) 37... Kxf4 38. Nxc7 Bb3 (38... Bc4 39. a4 $18)) 32... Rg7 33. R1d2 (33. b4 Na4 34. e3 Nc7 35. f4+ Kf6 36. Nd6 Bxa2 37. Rc1 Ke6 38. Re1 Nc3 39. e4 fxe4 40. Nxe4 Nxe4+ 41. Rexe4+ Kf6 42. Rd6+ Ne6 43. Rxb6 Bd5 44. Re5 Rd7 45. Ke3 Bc4) ( 33. h4 f4 34. hxg5 hxg5 35. b4 Na6 36. gxf4+ gxf4 37. Re4+ Kf6 38. Rh1 Bf5 39. Rd4 Ke5) (33. e3 Rd7 34. Rb1 Re7 35. b4 Na6 36. Rb2 Nac7 37. Na7 Bd7 38. Rbd2 b5 39. e4 Nf6) 33... f4 34. b4 (34. Na3 Nf6 35. b4 (35. Nc4+ Bxc4 36. Rxc4 Rf7 37. Rd8 Ra7 38. Rc2 $14) 35... Na6 36. e3 fxe3+ 37. Kxe3 Nc7 38. Kf2 $14) 34... Na4 (34... Na6 35. Re4+ (35. Na3 Nf6 (35... Naxb4 36. Nc4+ Kf6 37. gxf4 (37. Nxb6 Nxb6 (37... fxg3+ 38. hxg3 Nxb6 39. Rxb4 $14) 38. Rxb4 Nd5 39. Rbd4 $14) 37... gxf4 38. a3 $16) (35... Ndxb4 36. Re4+ Kf6 37. Rd6 Re7 38. Rxb6 $18) ( 35... Nac7 36. Nc4+ Kf6 37. a4 Rg8 38. b5 $16) 36. e3 fxe3+ 37. Kxe3 Nc7 38. Kf2 $14) 35... Kf6 36. Nd4 (36. Rdd4 h5 (36... Naxb4 37. Rxb4 Nxb4 38. Rxb4) 37. a3 Rh7 38. h4 $14) 36... Bd7 37. Nc2 Nac7 38. Red4 Be6 39. a4 $14) 35. Re4+ Kf6 36. Rc4 Ke5 (36... Ndc3 37. Rxc3 (37. Nxc3 Bxc4 38. Nxa4 b5 39. Nb6) 37... Nxc3 38. Nxc3) 37. a3 (37. Nd4 Bd7 38. Nc6+ $14) 37... h5 (37... Ndc3 38. Rxc3 Nxc3 39. Nxc3) 38. Re4+ (38. Nd4 Ne3 (38... Bd7 39. Nc2 Be6 40. e3 fxe3+ 41. Nxe3 Nxe3 42. Re4+ Kf6 43. Rxe3 Rg8 44. Rde2 $16) 39. Nc6+ (39. Rc1 Bd5 40. Rg1 (40. Nb5 Bc4 41. Rg1 Re7 42. Nd4 Kf6 43. gxf4 gxf4 44. Nc6 Re6 45. Nd8 Re8 46. Rd6+) 40... Nc4 {R2.3.2:}) 39... Kf6 40. Rc1 h4 41. Rd8 Rc7 (41... Nb2) 42. gxf4 gxf4 43. b5 Rd7 44. Rf8+ $14 Rf7 (44... Bf7 45. Nd8 Nc3)) (38. h4 fxg3+ 39. Kxg3 gxh4+ 40. Kxh4 Rg1 $11) 38... Kf6 39. gxf4 gxf4 40. h4 $1 {Diagram # With this move I just fix the two black weaknesses f4 and h5, to be explored, which will make easier to win.} Rg8 41. Rc2 Bd7 42. Nc7 Nac3 43. Rd4 Be6 44. Nxd5+ Nxd5 45. a4 Ra8 46. Rc6 Kf5 47. b5 Bf7 48. Rc1 Ke5 49. Re4+ Kf6 50. Rec4 Ra7 51. Rg1 Ra8 52. Rg5 Ke7 53. Re4+ Kf6 54. Rd4 Rd8 55. Rc4 Ke7 56. Rc6 Rd7 57. Re5+ Kf8 58. a5 bxa5 59. Ra6 Rb7 60. Rxa5 Kg7 61. Rg5+ Kf6 62. Ra6+ Ke7 63. Re5+ Kf8 64. Rf5 (64. Ra4 Kg7 65. Rd4 Rxb5 66. Rxf4 Bg6 67. Rg5 Nxf4 68. Rxb5 Kf6 69. e3 Ne6 70. Rb2 Bf7 71. e4 Nf4 72. Kg3 Nd3 73. Rb7 Nc5 74. Rb5 Nb3 75. Rb6+) 64... Rxb5 (64... Nc7 65. Raf6 Nxb5 66. Rxh5 (66. Rxf7+)) 65. Ra7 Nc7 66. Rxb5 (66. Rxf4 Rc5 67. Rf6 Kg7 68. Rb6 Ne8 69. e4 (69. Re6 Kf8 70. Ree7 Bg8 ( 70... Nd6 71. e4) 71. e4 Rc6 72. Red7 Rb6 73. e5 Rb2+ 74. Kg3 Rc2 75. Ra8 Rc4 76. Ra6 (76. f4) 76... Rc5 77. Kf4 Rc4+ 78. Kg5 Rc3 79. f4 Rg3+ 80. Kh6 Rf3) 69... Kf8 70. Rbb7 (70. Rd7 Rc4 71. Kg3 Rc1 72. Rh6 Kg8 73. e5 Ng7 74. Rf6 Be8 75. Re7) (70. Rh6) (70. Kg3) (70. Ke3 Rc4 71. Rbb7 Bg8 72. Kf4 Rc6 73. Rd7 Rf6+ 74. Ke3 Rc6 75. Kf2 Rf6 76. Rdb7 Rh6) 70... Bg8 71. Ra6 Bf7 72. Kg3 Rc3 73. Rd7 Rc5 74. Rh6 Kg7 75. Rb6 Kf8 76. Kf4 Rc4) 66... Nxb5 67. Ra4 Nc3 68. Rxf4 Nd1+ 69. Ke1 Ne3 70. Re4 Nf5 71. Kf2 Kg7 {The question now is: how to mobilize the passed pawns, keeping the activity of the rook? the answer: abandoning the h-pawn.} 72. Ra4 Kf6 (72... Be6 73. Ra5 Nxh4 74. Rxh5 Nf5 75. e4 Nd6 76. Ke3 Kg6 77. Rc5 Kf7 78. f4 Bc8 79. Kd4 (79. f5 Bb7 $11) 79... Ke7 80. Rh5 Nf7 81. Ke3 (81. f5 Kf6 82. Rh2 Bd7)) (72... Be8 73. Ra5 Kf6 74. e4 Nxh4 75. Kg3 Ng6 76. Rxh5 Ke6 77. Rc5 Ne7 78. f4 Kd6 79. Ra5) 73. e4 (73. Ra5 Nxh4 74. e4 Be8 75. Kg3 Ng6 76. Rxh5 Ne7 77. Rc5 Bc6 78. Kf2 Bd7 79. f4 Ng8) (73. Ra6+ Kg7 ( 73... Ke5 74. Ra5+ Kf4 75. Rb5 Be6) 74. Ra5 Nxh4 75. Kg3 Ng6 76. Rxh5 Nf8 77. Ra5 Ne6 78. f4 Nd4 79. e4 Kf6) 73... Nxh4 74. Ra5 Be8 (74... Ke7 75. Kg3 Ng6 76. Rxh5 Ke6 (76... Kd6) 77. Ra5 Ne7 78. f4 Nc6 (78... Kd6 79. Kg4) 79. Rb5 Kd6 80. Kg4 Nd4 81. Rb6+ Kc5 82. Rh6 Nc6 83. Kf5 Ne7+) (74... Kg7 75. Kg3 Ng6 76. Rxh5 Nf8 77. Ra5 Bg6 78. Ra6 Kf7 79. Kf4 Ke7) (74... Ng6 75. Rxh5 Ne5 (75... Ke6 76. Ra5 Be8 (76... Kd6 77. Ke3 Ne5 78. Ra8 Nc4+ (78... Nc6) (78... Kc5 79. Rc8+ Kd6 80. f4 Nc6) 79. Kd4 Ne5 80. f4 Nc6+ 81. Ke3 Bb3) 77. Ra6+ Ke5 78. Ke3 Bf7) (75... Ne7 76. Ra5 Nc6 (76... Bb3 77. Ke3 Ke6) 77. Ra6 Be8 78. Rb6 Ke5 ( 78... Kf7 79. f4 Kf6 80. Ke3) (78... Bd7) 79. Ke3 Bd7) 76. Rf5+ Ke6 77. f4 Nc4 78. Rg5 Ke7 79. Kf3 Nd6) 75. Kg3 (75. f4 Kg7 76. Kg3 Ng6 77. f5 Ne7) 75... Ng6 76. Rxh5 Ne7 (76... Ba4 77. Ra5 Bc2 (77... Bd7 78. Ra6+ Kf7 79. Rd6 Be6) 78. Ra6+ Kf7 79. Rd6 Ne5 (79... Ne7 80. Kf4 Ng6+ 81. Ke3 Ne5 82. Ra6 Kg7 83. Ra7+ Kg6) 80. f4) (76... Ne5 77. Rf5+ Ke6 78. f4 Nc4 (78... Nc6 79. Rb5 Kf6 80. Rd5 Nb4 81. Rd6+ Ke7 82. Rb6 Nd3 83. Kf3 Ne1+ 84. Ke2 Nc2 85. f5 Bb5+ 86. Kf3 Be8 87. Kf4 Nd4)) 77. Rc5 (77. Ra5 Bc6 78. Kf4 Be8 (78... Bd7 79. Ra6+ Nc6 80. Ke3 Kg6 (80... Kg5 81. Rb6 Kg6) (80... Ke6) 81. Rb6) (78... Ke6 79. Rc5 Kd6) 79. Ra6+ Nc6 80. Ke3 Kf7 (80... Bd7) 81. Rb6 Na5) 77... Bc6 78. Kf2 Ke6 79. Ke3 Kf6 80. f4 Bd7 81. Kf3 Bc6 82. Rc4 Bd7 (82... Ba8 83. Rd4 Ke6 84. Ra4 Bb7 85. Ra7) (82... Bb7 83. Rb4 Bc6 84. Kg4 Bd7+ 85. Kh4 Ng6+ 86. Kg3 Ne7 87. Rb6+ Nc6 88. Kh4) 83. Rb4 Bc6 (83... Ke6 84. Rb6+ Kf7 85. Rb7 Bc8 86. Rb4) 84. Kg4 Bd7+ 85. Kh4 Ng6+ 86. Kg3 Ne7 87. Rb6+ {To force the advance of the white king.} Bc6 88. Kh4 Kg6 89. Ra6 Kf6 90. Kh5 Kf7 91. e5 Bd7 {The last trench. But it will not last for long.} 92. Rf6+ Ke8 93. Kg5 Bc8 94. Rb6 Kf7 95. Rh6 Ke8 (95... Bd7 { Looses to} 96. e6+ Bxe6 97. Rf6+) 96. e6 Ng8 97. Rg6 Ne7 98. Rg7 Bxe6 99. Kf6 Nd5+ 100. Kxe6 Nxf4+ 101. Kd6 Kf8 102. Rg5 1-0   &nbsp;   &nbsp;   &nbsp;   <\/textarea><iframe src='https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-chessboard\/pgn4web\/board.html?am=n&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;iv=0&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=E6CC98&amp;dch=AD826A&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=14&amp;fmch=190CCC&amp;fcch=595959&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=14&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=677&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_4a615ca7' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='677' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and\/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts<\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n<p>Name of Federation: APXC \u2013 Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Portuguesa de Xadrez por Correspond\u00eancia<\/p>\n<p>Year of Foundation: 1983 \u2013 CNXC; Refoundation: 2010 \u2013 APXC<\/p>\n<p>ICCF Delegate: Jo\u00e3o Salvador Marques (jrodavlas@hotmail.com)<\/p>\n<p>E-Mail contact: Joaquim Pedro Soberano (soberano@apxc.pt)<\/p>\n<p>Website: http:\/\/www.apxc.pt\/ ; Blog: http:\/\/apxcpt.blogspot.com\/<\/p>\n<p>Article provided by: \u00c1lvaro Pereira \/ Joaquim Pedro Soberano<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>The definitive History of Chess in [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":704,"menu_order":26,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2839"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2839"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2839\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2845,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2839\/revisions\/2845"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}