{"id":2777,"date":"2011-12-12T14:10:18","date_gmt":"2011-12-12T13:10:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/?page_id=2777"},"modified":"2011-12-12T14:30:55","modified_gmt":"2011-12-12T13:30:55","slug":"guatemala","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/?page_id=2777","title":{"rendered":"Guatemala"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Name of Federation<\/strong>: Liga Guatemalteca de Ajedrez a Distancia (LIGUAD)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Year of Foundation<\/strong>: 1970<\/p>\n<p><strong>ICCF Delegate &amp; E-Mail contact<\/strong>: C\u00e9sar Augusto Blanco Gramajo (<a href=\"mailto:LIGUAD@gmail.com\">LIGUAD@gmail.com<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Website<\/strong>: none<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article provided by<\/strong>: C\u00e9sar Augusto Blanco Gramajo<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<p>The first efforts to promote CC in Guatemala date back to the early 1970s, when Paul Dougherty, through his magazine \u201cTablero\u201d (Chessboard)- published adverts on CADAP. Back then, he played in some postal events and managed to line-up a national team for some events, but they lacked continuity.<\/p>\n<p>As a result of those efforts, some other players were initiated into the activity and by the end of the 1970s, after consistent participation in some tournaments, Antonio Lascurain from Argentina proposed that C\u00e9sar Blanco Gramajo should take over LIGUAP\u2019s activities in order to have an official representation and try to increase the number of CC players in Guatemala.<\/p>\n<p>By the mid-1980s, the first national tournaments were organised and the first winner was Joachim Dorner, whilst the second event was won by Jaime Briz. Sadly, the local postal service became worse and many players started to quit.<\/p>\n<p>As a result of those tournaments, Guatemala managed to line-up a national team for the Panamerican tournament and the Olympiad for the first time.<\/p>\n<p>In 1996 and 1997, Guatemala obtained its first International Masters through the achievements of Messrs Dorner and Blanco Gramajo, and in 1999 the latter also achieved the Senior International Master Title. Before these, Guatemala had also obtained some good results such as the second place in the CADAP Zonal tournament, the leadership in CADAP\u2019s ranking, and representation at \u00be-Finals of the World Championship.<\/p>\n<p>It is in the year 1997 that Joachim Dorner was elected President of LIGUAP and began strong work in order to raise Latin American correspondence chess. This led him to the Presidency of CADAP in 1998 but, surprisingly, he retired a couple of months later from all chess activities, leaving LIGUAP without a proper representative too. After that, Mr. C\u00e9sar Blanco took responsibility of being LIGUAP\u2019s President.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Blanco won two titles of CADAP zonal tournaments between 2001 and 2005 (XIII and XIV) and also got the first postal GM title for the Central America and Caribbean region in 2003.<\/p>\n<p>Guatemala has participated in team (Olympiad and Panamerican) tournaments actively since the 90&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p>Also, and additional SIM title was got by Mr. Francisco Guevara in 2005.<\/p>\n<p>By 2005, LIGUAP change his name to LIGUAD to reflect a more flexible field of action (P = postal, D = distance).<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<p>Finally, Guatemala has also already participated in three world championship finals (XXII, XXIV and XXVI) though GM C\u00e9sar Blanco.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2783\" style=\"width: 235px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Cesar.jpg\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2783\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2783\" title=\"Cesar\" src=\"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Cesar-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Cesar-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Cesar-112x150.jpg 112w, https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/Cesar.jpg 233w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2783\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">C\u00e9sar Augusto Blanco Gramajo<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<p>==<\/p>\n<p>games<\/p>\n<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_a7429531' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event \"Najdorf Memorial \"]  [Site \"?\"]  [Date \"2001.03.??\"]  [Round \"?\"]  [White \"Blanco , Cesar Augusto\"]  [Black \"Vinot, Serge\"]  [Result \"1-0\"]  [ECO \"E84\"]  [WhiteElo \"2508\"]  [BlackElo \"2524\"]  [Annotator \"english comments\"]  [PlyCount \"213\"]  [EventDate \"2001.03.24\"]  [SourceDate \"2001.03.24\"]   {This game represent the \"culmination\" of a lot of years of work in search of  the GM title.\u00a0\u00a0 After 107 moves, French Master Serge Vinot, who at the end won  the tournament, sent me the \"long waited\" message \"I surrender\" and with it  the GM title.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 {Even Mr. Vinot is  an expert in this setup, my decision to play the Saemish system\u00a0 (my favorite  with both colours), not was a difficult call.} O-O 6. Be3 Nc6 7. Nge2 a6 8. Qd2  Rb8 {\"the Panno variation in this system\"} 9. h4 {I had used the usual paths  around 9.g4, Nc1 and Rb1 with reasonable success.\u00a0 But this time, with the  purpose to complicate as soon as possible, I choose 9.h4 (a move that  statistically had not had good results over the board- but to me it had a good  record in postal games)} h5 {e5 and b5 are other options.} 10. Bh6 b5 {  the game Spassky-Fischer, in the \"re-match\" in Belgrado, 1992 followed 10....  e5 10.Bxg7 Kxg7 11.d5 and white was better.} 11. O-O-O {it seems like\u00a0 11.Bxg7  and 11.cxd5 give \"better\" chances for white, but loyal to my style, I tried to  keep the tension'} e5 12. Nd5 $6 {It was normal to play 12.Bxg7, followed by  13.d5, 13.dxe5 or Nd5, but again I preferred to keep the tension.} Bxh6 {  the best and commonmove} (12... bxc4 13. Nxf6+ Bxf6 (13... Qxf6 $2 14. Bg5 Qe6  15. d5 $18) 14. d5 $1 ({taking with the rook is risky for white} 14. Bxf8 exd4  $3 $132 {\/\\ Nb4 with strong initiative}) 14... Nb4 15. Nc3 Re8 16. Bxc4 a5 17.  g4 $1 Kh7 18. Rdg1 Ba6 19. Bxa6 Nxa6 20. gxh5 gxh5 21. Bg5 $16 {Lin Ta-Peng  Xiaomin, China 1991}) (12... Re8 13. Nxf6+ Bxf6 14. d5 $14) 13. Qxh6 bxc4 {  usual answer, but black has also tried 13....Nxd5} 14. g4 {white starts an  attack over the black king with the hope of avoiding a consolidation in the  centre.} (14. Nxf6+ {looks inferior} Qxf6 15. d5 Na5 (15... Na7 16. Nc3 Nb5 17.  Qe3 Nxc3 18. Qxc3 Qf4+ 19. Rd2 f5 20. exf5 Bxf5 21. Bxc4 a5 22. b3 a4 23. Kb2  Rb6 24. b4 Kh8 25. Ka3 c6 26. g3 Qh6 27. Re1 Qg7 28. Qe3 Rfb8 29. dxc6 Rxc6 30.  Bd5 Rc7 31. Kxa4 Bc2+ 32. Ka3 e4 33. Rd4 Ra7+ 34. Kb2 Rxb4+ 35. Kc3 Ra3+ 36.  Bb3 Rbxb3+ 37. axb3 Rxb3+ 38. Kd2 Rxe3 39. Kxe3 exf3 40. Rc4 Bb3 {0-1 Hoeksema,  H-Nijboer,F\/Leeuwarden 1995\/EXT 97 (40)}) 16. Nc3 Bd7 17. Rd2 (17. Be2 Qg7 18.  Qe3 Rb6 $15) 17... Qg7 18. Qe3 f5 19. exf5 Bxf5 20. Be2 Rb4 21. g4 hxg4 22.  fxg4 Bd3 23. h5 e4 24. Bxd3 cxd3 25. hxg6 Rxb2 26. Rxd3 Rb4 27. Rh7 Qxg6 28.  Rh5 exd3 29. Rg5 Rf1+ 30. Nd1 Rb1+ {0-1 Reilly,T-Barcenilla,R\/Canberra 1995\/  EXT 97 (30)}) 14... Bxg4 $6 $146 {A novelty at that time.\u00a0 The bishop is  \"sacrificed\" in this type of positions, but the usual 14...Nxd5 has given good  results to black.} (14... Nxd5 15. exd5 Nb4 16. Nc3 (16. gxh5 Nxa2+ $19) 16...  exd4 17. Rxd4 Qf6 18. Qf4 (18. Qe3 hxg4 19. fxg4 Bxg4 20. Bxc4 Rfe8 21. Qd2 Bf5  22. h5 gxh5 23. Rg1+ Bg6 24. Rf4 Qg7 25. Ne4 Re5 26. a3 Nxd5 27. Bxd5 Rxd5 28.  Rxg6 Rxd2 29. Rxg7+ Kxg7 30. Nxd2 Kg6 31. Rc4 {1\/2-1\/2 Grosso,R-Berdichesky,R\/  ARG-ch14 corr 1994\/Corr 2000 (31)}) 18... Qxf4+ 19. Rxf4 hxg4 20. Bxc4 c6 21.  fxg4 cxd5 22. Nxd5 Be6 23. Rd1 {1\/2-1\/2 Hansen,C-Jensen,I\/DEN-ch corr 1984\/  Corr Nr. 1 (23).}) 15. Ng3 $1 {Not caring about the bishop and concentrating  pieces for the attack.\u00a0 Later, Serge will comment that he did not find a good  answer to this move.} (15. Nxf6+ {no veo que conduzca a ningun sitio :} Qxf6  16. fxg4 exd4 {con ventaja negra}) (15. fxg4 Nxg4 $17) 15... Nxd4 (15... Bxf3 {  allows white to followwith} 16. Nf5 Ne8 17. Rg1 {with too many treats over the  black king}) (15... c3 {it looks interesting, but also white develops a strong  attack} 16. bxc3 exd4 (16... Nxd5 17. fxg4 $40) 17. Nf5 Bxf5 18. exf5 Ne5 19.  fxg6 fxg6 20. Bc4 $40) (15... Nxd5 16. fxg4 $16) 16. Bxc4 {White has now and  advantage, but there is a lon way to go...} c6 (16... Nxf3 {is refuted by} 17.  Nf5 Bxf5 18. exf5 c6 19. fxg6 cxd5 20. g7 Nh7 21. gxf8=Q+ Qxf8 22. Qxh5 dxc4  23. Qxf3 $16) 17. Nxf6+ Qxf6 18. fxg4 Rb4 19. Bd3 Qf2 {now, black is able to  simplify the position and seems to be a compensation for black in its central  pawn chain} 20. Qd2 {only move, since after} (20. Rd2 Qxg3 21. gxh5 Qf4 22.  Qxf4 exf4 {black would be better}) 20... Qxd2+ 21. Rxd2 hxg4 {the positions  seems equal, but white finds the way to keep some edge.} 22. h5 $1 f5 (22... d5  {parece complicar las aspiraciones del blanco}) 23. hxg6 f4 {black has two  united \/ passed pawns.\u00a0 Is there something in white's position ?} 24. Nh5 (24.  Nf5 {trying to get also two passed pawns, does not look better for white.} Nxf5  25. exf5 g3 $15) 24... g3 {very active and dangerous move that deserves white  to be careful.\u00a0\u00a0 In any case, 24...d5 looked the best move at this point.} 25.  b3 {white is still better, but by no means the game is won.} d5 26. Bxa6 dxe4  $6 {a \"tornado\" of black pawns !!, but probably the move that losses the game.  It was better\u00a0 26...Nf3'} 27. Rg2 {critical moment.\u00a0 White is now clearly  better but some tactical details are still coming.} (27. Bc4+ Rxc4+ 28. bxc4 e3  29. Rb2 e2 $1 30. g7 g2 31. gxf8=Q+ Kxf8 32. Rg1 f3 33. Rb8+ Ke7 34. Rb7+ Kf8)  27... Nf5 {the options were :} (27... e3 28. Nxg3 fxg3 29. Rxg3 $16) ({and}  27... Rf5 28. Kb2 Rg5 29. Kc3 Rb6 30. Bc4+ Kf8 31. Nf6 Kg7 32. Nxe4 Rxg6 33.  Rh5 Nf3 34. a4 $18) 28. a3 {trying to deviate the rook form the fouth row.  The move 28.g7 , which seems to win soon, has some tricks :} (28. g7 Rf7 29.  Bc4 Rxc4+ 30. bxc4 e3 $1 31. Rb2 $1 (31. Rd1 $2 Nd4 {and black has the  advantage now !}) 31... Rxg7 32. Nxg7 Kxg7 33. Rf1 Kf6 34. a4 $16) 28... Rd4 {  Now 29.g7 it does not work because of Nxg7 30.Nxg3 fxg3 31.Rxg3 Rf3 !'} 29.  Bc4+ Rxc4+ 30. bxc4 e3 {white also has a clear advantage after :} (30... f3 31.  Rxg3 Nxg3 32. Nxg3 e3 33. Re1 e2 34. Nxe2 fxe2 35. Rxe2 $18) (30... Ne3 31. Rd2  g2 32. Rg1 f3 33. g7 Ra8 34. Rd7 Ng4 35. Rgd1 Kh7 36. g8=Q+ Kxg8 37. Rg7+ Kf8  38. Rxg4 Rxa3 39. Kb2 Rd3 40. Rg1) 31. g7 Rf7 32. Rb2 Rxg7 33. Rb8+ $1 (33.  Nxg7 {looks like the \"winning\" move, but just brings a draw after hard work :}  Kxg7 34. Rf1 Kf6 $1 35. a4 Nh4 36. Kd1 g2 37. Rg1 f3 38. Ke1 Kf5 39. a5 Kf4 40.  Re2 Ke4 41. a6 Kd3 42. Rb2 e4 43. Rb3+ Kd4) 33... Kf7 34. Rb7+ Kg6 35. Nxg7 {  This is the correct moment to take with the purpose of eliminate the \"big\"  black knight that supports the black pawn chain.} Nxg7 36. Rxg7+ $1 {the  winning move !\u00a0 After :} (36. Kd1 f3 {black pawns are unstoppable !}) (36. a4  f3 37. Kc2 f2 38. Rbb1 Kf5 39. Kd3 Kf4 40. Rh4+ Kg5 {and black is winning})  36... Kxg7 37. Rg1 {white must play accurately to win !\u00a0 If..} (37. Kc2 e4 38.  Rg1 Kf6 39. Kd1 Kg5 {winning for black}) 37... Kf6 38. a4 Kf5 39. Kd1 {  At this point (april, 2002), I knew\u00a0 the final GM norm it was very close.\u00a0 I  had three remaining games, I needed 2.5 points, and in all my games I had an  advantage!!} Kg4 40. Ke2 e4 41. a5 f3+ 42. Kxe3 g2 43. a6 Kg3 44. a7 f2 45.  Rxg2+ Kxg2 46. a8=Q f1=Q {And now what ?\u00a0 White seems to be in material  disadvantage and seems like only a draw is possible ?} 47. Qg8+ $1 {A vital  and necessary tempo !} Kh2 48. Kxe4 {and now, given his \"best position\", white  must be able to take the last black pawn.\u00a0 It is now a \"mathematical\"  calculation !} Qe2+ 49. Kf5 Qf2+ 50. Ke6 Qd4 51. Qh7+ Kg2 52. Qg6+ Kf3 53. Qf5+  Ke3 54. c5 Qb4 55. Kd6 Qb5 56. Qe5+ $1 Kd3 57. Qg3+ Ke4 58. Qg4+ Ke3 59. Qf5  Qa6 {a \"short break\" of checks to get the necessary space} 60. Qh3+ Ke4 61.  Qg4+ Ke3 62. Qb4 Qa8 63. Qc4 Qb7 64. Qe6+ Kd4 65. Qg4+ Kc3 66. Qd7 Qa8 67. Qxc6  Qd8+ 68. Qd7 Qf6+ 69. Qe6 Qd8+ 70. Kc6 Qa8+ 71. Kd7 Qa7+ 72. Kd6 Qb8+ 73. Kd5  Qb3+ 74. Ke5 Qd1 75. Qd6 Qh5+ 76. Ke6 Qe8+ 77. Kd5 Qb5 78. Qf6+ Kc2 79. Qg7  Qb3+ 80. Kc6 Qa4+ 81. Kd6 Qf4+ 82. Qe5 Qf8+ 83. Kd5 Qg8+ 84. Qe6 Qd8+ 85. Qd6  Qg8+ 86. Kc6 Qf7 87. Qh2+ Kd3 88. Qg3+ Kc4 89. Kb6 Qf8 90. Qh4+ Kb3 91. Qh2 Kc4  92. Qc2+ Kd5 93. Qd3+ Ke5 94. Qd7 Qf2 95. Qd6+ Ke4 96. Qe6+ Kd3 97. Qd5+ Kc3  98. Kb7 Qb2+ 99. Kc8 Qb5 100. Qf3+ Kd2 101. c6 Qa6+ 102. Kd7 Qa4 103. Kd6 Qb4+  104. Ke6 Qa4 105. Qd5+ Ke1 106. c7 Qe8+ 107. Kf6 1-0   &nbsp;       &nbsp;   <\/textarea><iframe src='https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-chessboard\/pgn4web\/board.html?am=n&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;iv=0&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=E6CC98&amp;dch=AD826A&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=14&amp;fmch=190CCC&amp;fcch=595959&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=14&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_a7429531' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and\/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts<\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>==<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n<p>Name of Federation: Liga Guatemalteca de Ajedrez a Distancia (LIGUAD)<\/p>\n<p>Year of Foundation: 1970<\/p>\n<p>ICCF Delegate &amp; E-Mail contact: C\u00e9sar Augusto Blanco Gramajo (LIGUAD@gmail.com)<\/p>\n<p>Website: none<\/p>\n<p>Article provided by: C\u00e9sar Augusto Blanco Gramajo<\/p>\n<p>The first efforts to promote CC in Guatemala date back to the early 1970s, when Paul Dougherty, through his magazine \u201cTablero\u201d [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":706,"menu_order":6,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2777"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2777"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2777\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2779,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2777\/revisions\/2779"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/706"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kszgk.com\/iccf\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}