{"id":1849,"date":"2017-08-30T11:52:08","date_gmt":"2017-08-30T09:52:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/bielecki\/?page_id=1849"},"modified":"2017-09-01T10:11:35","modified_gmt":"2017-09-01T08:11:35","slug":"games-including-commented","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/kszgk.com\/bielecki\/mt-bielecki\/mt-bielecki-bulletin\/games-including-commented\/","title":{"rendered":"Games, including commented"},"content":{"rendered":"

MT-Bielecki Bulletin<\/h2>\n

<- Back to\u00a0Table of Contents<\/a><\/p>\n

Games Statistics<\/h2>\n

Draw percentage<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Draw percentage is high (83%), but this is common feature of current cc tournaments, especially high rated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Result<\/th>\nN<\/th>\n%<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
78<\/th>\n100<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
White Win (1:0)<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Black Win (0:1)<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Draw (0,5:0,5)<\/td>\n65<\/td>\n83<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Number of moves<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Number of moves in the event in total: 2888; Average number of moves per game: 37<\/p>\n

The longest game has 92 moves (Ljubicic-Lafarga) and the shortest one 15 (Hoeven-Langeveld).<\/p>\n

David Lafarga \u2013 503 moves in the event with average 42 and Leonardo Ljubicic – 498 moves with average 42 were the most persistent players. They played also the longest game (92 moves).<\/p>\n

Maximilian Voss \u2013 347 moves with average 29 and Arno Nickel – 348 moves with average 29 were on the economical side.<\/p>\n

More detailed statistics see below.<\/p>\n

Openings statistics<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Openings<\/th>\nN<\/th>\n%<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
78<\/th>\n100,0<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
1.e4<\/td>\n48<\/td>\n61,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1.d4<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n34,6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1.Nf3<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n3,9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

The most popular opening was Sicilian Defence (27) – especially Najdorf (14) – ahead of Queen’s Gambit (13) and Ruy Lopez (13). For more detailed statistics see below.<\/p>\n

Openings classification by ECO (78 games)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
A<\/th>\n3<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\nA \u2013 Flank openings<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nA1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nA17<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nA17 English Opening, Hedgehog Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nA9<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nA90<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nA90 Dutch Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
B<\/th>\n30<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\nB \u2013 Semi-Open Games other than the French Defence<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB1<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB12<\/td>\n3<\/td>\nB12 Caro\u2013Kann Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB3<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB30<\/td>\n3<\/td>\nB30 Sicilian Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB31<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nB31 Sicilian, Nimzovich\u2013Rossolimo Attack<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB33<\/td>\n5<\/td>\nB33 Sicilian, Sveshnikov (Lasker\u2013Pelikan) Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB4<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB40<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nB40 Sicilian Defence, 2.Nf3 e6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB49<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nB49 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB5<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB54<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nB54 Sicilian<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB9<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB90<\/td>\n10<\/td>\nB90 Sicilian, Najdorf<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB94<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nB94 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.Bg5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB96<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nB96 Sicilian, Najdorf, 7.f4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nB97<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nB97 Sicilian, Najdorf, 7…Qb6 including Poisoned Pawn Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
C<\/th>\n19<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\nC \u2013 Open Games and the French Defence<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC1<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC10<\/td>\n6<\/td>\nC10 French, Paulsen Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC6<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC67<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nC67 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence, Open Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC8<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC88<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nC88 Ruy Lopez, Closed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC89<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nC89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall Counterattack<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC9<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC92<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nC92 Ruy Lopez, Closed, 9.h3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC93<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nC93 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Smyslov Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nC95<\/td>\n4<\/td>\nC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer Defence, 10.d4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
D<\/th>\n17<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\nD \u2013 Closed Games and Semi-Closed Games<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD20<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nD20 Queen’s Gambit Accepted<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD27<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nD27 Queen’s Gambit Accepted, Classical Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD30<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nD30 Queen’s Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD4<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD43<\/td>\n7<\/td>\nD43 Queen’s Gambit Declined: Semi-Slav Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD44<\/td>\n3<\/td>\nD43 Queen’s Gambit Declined: Semi-Slav Defence 5.Bg5 dxc4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD72<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nD72 Neo-Gr\u00fcnfeld, 5.cxd5, Main line<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD76<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nD76 Neo-Gr\u00fcnfeld, 6.cxd5 Nxd5, 7.0-0 Nb6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD8<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nD81<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nD81 Gr\u00fcnfeld; Russian Variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
E<\/th>\n9<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\nE \u2013 Indian Defenses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE0<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE04<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nE04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE05<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nE05 Catalan, Open, Classical line<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE17<\/td>\n1<\/td>\nE17 Queen’s Indian, 5.Bg2 Be7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE32<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical Variation (4.Qc2)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE5<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE58<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nE58 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line with 8…Bxc3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE6<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nE60<\/td>\n2<\/td>\nE60 King’s Indian Defence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

===<\/p>\n

Game records<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Game records can be displayed at the tournament website<\/a> or downloaded from ICCF server (pgn format)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Few games annotated by participants can be found below as an attachment to this file. One game was annotated by GM (OTB) Twan Burg. Many thanks for that.<\/p>\n

==================<\/p>\n

Please select specific annotated game from pull down menu.<\/p>\n